There should be 3 routes with hourly frequency from Kengeri Via City station, YPR second from B Cantt Via BYPL and third from Whitefield to Aiport then you can expect occupancy. Regarding financial viability with the fares of passenger trains they will be a burden to SWR atleast charge Express fare.

---

Are u sure the route requires 16 coach VB? few days back I'm summer in the month of May there is a blog about occupancy of SBC Dharwad VB with occupancy figures and its avg is 80%. I have fact checked the same on weekday and found Dharwad Hubli has given 50% footfall and reamaing 25% in Davangere for a 8 coach train. You can cross check previous blogs post of the VB.

---

Yes very need to be extended upto Patancheru ORR Junction and upto Ramoji Film City or ORR Junction on Vijayawada Highway which is part of Phase 2

---

Its high traffic corridor from west to south from Miyapur to LB nagar metro line which needs to be extended on both ends as city is extended upto ORR.

---

They will plan from Varanasi to Howrah in morning as already Ranchi Varanasi is running in opp direction.

---

If VB is planned at 400 in morning it will cross Thrissur at 500 which is also not a convenient dep and will clash with Coimbatore VB at 730. Coimbatore VB is itself not doing that great and after tim8ngs changed people are travelling to Hosur 60-90 ttavellers each way as there is no intercity in morning. The occupancy will completely dependent on Thrissur and Palakkad and will not fill up 400 seats every day. In return from Bengaluru it will have decent occupancy being second half of the day but only kerala travellers. Coimbatore VB is definitely a wrong decision , operational expense

---

This TT is practical and achievable or add 15 mins 530 dep with 8hrs 45mins. Tiruppur stoppage is also not required as people may not get down from ERS and Thrissur and alternative trains available to Benguluru.

---

I am talking about Tiruppur Textile town and not Tirupputur.

---