4. Stabling at TPTY is probably just parking the rake against occupying a pitline in TPTY, if this RSA is given, one day slot for maintenance at TPTY pitlines will become free and pitlines at TEN are underutilised.
5. PGT doesn't have pitlines. They have only MEMU shed.
8. Instead, MAS BZA VB can be operated in shorter route and can be extended either to SC or COA or whatsoever, and a new VB can be given for TPTY VSKP, for which the demand is persisting from beginning onwards.
please wait...Translate to English4. Stabling at TPTY is basically just parking the train at TPTY without taking up a maintenance slot. So, if this train sharing agreement (RSA) is given, it will free up a maintenance slot at TPTY and the pitlines at TEN are not being fully utilized.
5. PGT doesn't have pitlines. They only have a MEMU shed.
8. Instead, it would be better to operate MAS BZA VB on a shorter route and then extend it to SC or COA or whatever. A new VB can be given for TPTY VSKP, as there has been a demand for it since the beginning.
please wait...Translate to Hindi4. TPTY mein stabling karne ka matlab hai ki rakes ko TPTY mein ek pitline mein park kar diya jata hai. Agar ye RSA diya jaata hai, toh ek din ka maintenance slot TPTY pitlines mein khali ho jayega aur TEN ke pitlines kam istemal ho rahe hai.
5. PGT mein pitlines nahi hai. Wahaan sirf MEMU shed hai.
8. Iske bajaye, MAS BZA VB ko chota route mein chalaya jaa sakte hai aur ise SC ya COA ya kuch aur tak extend kiya jaa sakta hai. Aur ek naya VB TPTY VSKP ke liye diya ja sakta hai, jiski maang shuru se hi bani hui hai.